Yesterday we visited St John's cathedral in Parramatta. My husband is part of the ministers' fraternal in the district, although I'm not sure why, and knows some there.
We were a bit late arriving, because we had planned to have coffee before the 11:00 am service. As we walked past, we saw there was a service at 9:30 so we went in. Apparently the later service, like the very early one is more traditional. This one seems to be aimed at familes, although the large noticebard outside says it is Morning Prayers oo communion. Note the plural "prayers." The traditional Anglican Morning Prayer is not what is meant.
A greeter gave us the usual forest of trees in the form of a service sheet and the parish booklet. St John's has been a centre of worship since 1803, probably the longest serving church in Sydney, although the cathedral dates from about 1850. Parramatta is the geographical centre of Sydney and has been declared a city for many years.
I didn't know and cannot now remember at all the opening song. There was, according to the booklet, a "leader" and a preacher. I had been expecting two scripture readings There was only one. Then the sermon. I found this order strange, but realise now it could have been because the sermon at least was broadcast.
Both leader and preacher wore a clerical collar. Thses are not very common down here now. I did expect vestments, but no luck. The collar looked out of place and quite strange. I haven't seen a clergyman wearing one of these for years.
It was Trinity Sunday yesterday, but if I hadn't been following the liturgical year apart from church services, I would never have known. Not a mention. There was a rather skimpy looking embroidery, I hesitate to call it a banner, hanging from the reading light in the pulpit. It depicted tongues of fire and was red so I surmised it might not have been tidied away after Pentecost Sunday a week ago. There wasn't any other colour in the church, so I doubt it was a special pentecost banner, unless it belonged to either the Chinese or Persian congregations associatd with the cathedral.
It was a really scrappy sermon on Matthew 11 which they seemed to be working through. It went for quite a while longer than I expected but was perhaps very hastily prepared and little research and exegesis done. For at least 15 minutes, the preacher rambled and went in a very crooked line. He did at least start with a piece from the news, unlike the preacher last week at another church who used illustrations obviously from some book of sermon stories.
My mind wandered and I enjoyed looking at the superb workmanship in stone and wood and glass. I was wondering what someone from say, 1870, would think of this hotchpotch of services when I realised that somewhere a huge leap had been taken in both logic and subject matter as the preacher announced he would pray a prayer of commitment. Those listening on the radio as well as those in the cathedral were invited to say the prayer. I was at least glad it was a bit more than the so-called "sinner's prayer." This was followed by "Just as I am, without one plea."
A member of the congregation prayed and we sang again, this time, "Give thanks with a grateful heart."
The congregation was led in a watered down version of the general confession but there was no absolution given. Not even the verses from John's epistle were read.
Notices were shown on the dataprojector and we rose to sing what I had hoped would be the redeeming feature of the service. "At the name of Jesus, every knee will bow." I really hope the broadcast had stopped by then because nobody much seemed to know the tune and certainly didn't know that the song starts on the second beat of the bar. Too early every time. At the last verse, people were getting the hang of it but the organist seemed to have decided if he couldn't beat them, to join them. So this time the congregation came in on time and the organ was early.
Coffee afterwards was in the hall and seemed to me to be Interdenominational Roast, served in foam cups. There were some rather nice examples of home baking for morning tea and a piece of sponge helped the coffee down. I don't like/drink instant coffee, unless put on the spot like this and my cup confirmed me in this..
My husband introduced me to the preacher whom he knew. He gulped when I asked him a few questions and said how much I had enjoyed St James, King Street. I was given a few glib answers and I really don't think he appreciated my further questions with a bit more theological backing to them. Chalk and cheese, as he saying goes.
We escaped as quickly as I could get my husband out. I really felt totally dissatisfied. We are trying to find a place to worship that we both enjoy. He enjoyed the appeal and commended the minister for it. To me, it certainly didn't fit in logic or response to the sermon. The whole service left me empty and I really think I got more from looking at the carvings etc and thinking of earlier parish life than I did from what was happening around me.
This annoyed me because I do believe that church is not about me. I go to worship in fellowship with other believers. There seemed to be little connection and no feeling of relationship within the congregation. The form of the service was very disappoininting to me. It was all over the place and nothing fitted together.
Recent Comments